Packaging
FSIS: Use of the voluntary claim 'natural' in meat labelling 14 Sep 2009
The U.S. Department of Agriculture's (USDA) Food Safety and Inspection Service (FSIS) announced that it will solicit further public comment as the Agency seeks to define the conditions under which it would permit the voluntary claim "natural" to be used in the labelling of meat and poultry products.
The agency made the announcement through the publication of an Advance Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (ANPR).
The Agency is seeking comments to clarify and resolve issues surrounding the "natural" claim, including how best to coordinate FSIS' regulation of "natural" claims with the Agricultural Marketing Service's (AMS) voluntary "naturally raised" marketing claim standard. The Agency believes that the ANPR will facilitate the emergence of consensus on the meaning of "natural" and will allow the Agency to move quickly to a proposed rule.
The current FSIS policy states that the term "natural" may be used in the labelling of meat and poultry products provided that the product does not contain any artificial flavour or flavouring, colouring ingredients, chemical preservative, or any other artificial or synthetic ingredient and that the product is not more than minimally processed.
In October 2006, FSIS received a petition requesting that the Agency initiate rulemaking to establish a codified definition for the voluntary claim "natural" and to delineate the conditions under which the claim can be used on the labels of meat and poultry products. In December 2006, FSIS held a public meeting and requested comments on "natural" claims.
FSIS received a high volume of comments that expressed divergent views on the use of the claim "natural" following the December 2006 public meeting.
Therefore, FSIS is publishing an ANPR to solicit more focused comments on the issue. The ANPR requests comments on a number of issues related to the use of "natural" claims in the labelling of meat and poultry products.
The Agency is seeking comments to clarify and resolve issues surrounding the "natural" claim, including how best to coordinate FSIS' regulation of "natural" claims with the Agricultural Marketing Service's (AMS) voluntary "naturally raised" marketing claim standard. The Agency believes that the ANPR will facilitate the emergence of consensus on the meaning of "natural" and will allow the Agency to move quickly to a proposed rule.
The current FSIS policy states that the term "natural" may be used in the labelling of meat and poultry products provided that the product does not contain any artificial flavour or flavouring, colouring ingredients, chemical preservative, or any other artificial or synthetic ingredient and that the product is not more than minimally processed.
In October 2006, FSIS received a petition requesting that the Agency initiate rulemaking to establish a codified definition for the voluntary claim "natural" and to delineate the conditions under which the claim can be used on the labels of meat and poultry products. In December 2006, FSIS held a public meeting and requested comments on "natural" claims.
FSIS received a high volume of comments that expressed divergent views on the use of the claim "natural" following the December 2006 public meeting.
Therefore, FSIS is publishing an ANPR to solicit more focused comments on the issue. The ANPR requests comments on a number of issues related to the use of "natural" claims in the labelling of meat and poultry products.
For detailed description of these issues, please refer to the ANPR, which is posted on FSIS' Web site at http://www.fsis.usda.gov/regulations_&_policies/2009_Notices_Index/index.asp.
Source and for more info: Visit FSIS
More Packaging
- 16 Mar 2010Cryovac Marinade Package wins Gold Award
- 11 Mar 2010Package damage greatly affects sales
- 02 Mar 2010Increasing optimism in packaging industry
- 09 Feb 2010Ishida packaging targets IFFA
- 03 Feb 2010Food industry demand for 100% rPET
- 25 Jan 2010Potential of dairy-based package wraps outlined
- 19 Jan 2010Packaging sector questions nanotech criticism
- 13 Jan 2010Amcor ReClose for sliced meat range
- 07 Jan 2010ISHIDA: Packing line solutions demonstrated at Foodex
- 04 Jan 2010Irish plea for avoiding pork mislabelling
- 30 Dec 2009Online tool that decodes beef labels
- 29 Dec 2009InterFlex aquires C&H Packaging fom Appleton Paper
- 24 Dec 2009USDA: Further public comments for proposed rule for nutrition labelling
- 16 Dec 2009New Alcan plant targets Central and Eastern Europe
- 11 Dec 2009Alcan Packaging: production in the Czech Republic
- 04 Dec 2009Hormel Foods: Reductions in product packaging
- 26 Nov 2009Call for Europe to adopt clearer food labelling
- 24 Nov 2009Foodservice packaging leaders announce merger
- 18 Nov 2009UK meat packaging waste to be studied
- 17 Nov 2009Australia: Pork labels misleading to consumers
- 10 Nov 2009Cryovac offers a high-abuse post pasteurization bag
- 29 Oct 2009Marel: Weigh Price Labelling
- 27 Oct 2009US blocks WTO COOL request
- 23 Oct 2009Amcor Flexibles wins two Scanstar awards
- 20 Oct 2009Company receives multi-million Chinese government subsidy
- 15 Oct 2009Pearson Packaging launches new service to help customers
- 08 Oct 2009Canadian dispute panel request regarding COOL
- 07 Oct 2009Thailand: Halal food to international standards
- 05 Oct 2009US: TPC acquires Tray-Pak
- 01 Oct 2009Flexible packaging to grow by 3.5% per year
- 29 Sep 2009Faerch Plast: Transparent food packaging demand growing
- 23 Sep 2009Amcor retains place in Dow Jones Sustainability Indices
- 21 Sep 2009Sealed Air unveils software platform
- 17 Sep 2009Mettler Toledo Safeline: New canning inspection systems
- 16 Sep 2009UK: Vacuum packing training online
- 10 Sep 2009New entry-level oxygen analyser for package headspace
- 01 Sep 2009Multivac to present new thermoformers and traysealers
- 27 Aug 2009Graphic Packaging - closing of $180 M senior notes offering
- 20 Aug 2009Amcor offers to acquire parts of Alcan Packaging
- 14 Aug 2009Multivac: Thermoformer
